NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: BTM1 v Scout Association of Australia New South Wales Branch [2023] NSWSC 431 Hearing dates: 17 June 2022, 8 July 2022 Date of orders: 28 April 2023 Decision date: 28 April 2023 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Garling J Decision: See [244] Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — Stay of proceedings — Claim for damages for historical sexual abuse — Abuse admitted — Abuse occurred between 1979 and 1982 — Claim of direct liability against institution — No available evidence regarding the defendant's knowledge of any particular risk posed by the perpetrator — No available evidence which would enable a response to allegations of breach of duty — Permanent stay ordered CIVIL PROCEDURE — Stay of proceedings — Claim of vicarious liability — No evidence of the particular role assigned to the perpetrator — Permanent stay ordered CIVIL PROCEDURE — Stay of proceedings — Claim for damages for historical sexual abuse — Abuse admitted — Perpetrator alive and available to give evidence — Where perpetrator had pleaded guilty to and been sentenced for related offences — Where perpetrator was shown to have an interest in shifting moral blame for his conduct — Perpetrator not an independent witness whose availability would enable a fair trial Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 Pt 1B, Div 3 Civil Procedure Act 2005 s 67 Evidence Act 1995 Limitation Act 1969 s 6A Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 r 2.1 Cases Cited: Clancy v Plaintiffs A, B, C and D; Bird v Plaintiffs A, B, C and D [2022] NSWCA 119 Fields v Trustees of the Marist Brothers [2022] NSWSC 739 Hollis v Vabu Pty Ltd (2001) 207 CLR 21; [2001] HCA 44 Moubarak by his tutor Coorey v Holt (2019) 100 NSWLR 218; [2019] NSWCA 102 New South Wales v Lepore (2003) 212 CLR 511; [2003] HCA 4 PCB v Geelong College [2021] VSC 633 Plaintiff A and B v Bird; Plaintiff C v Bird; Plaintiff D v Bird [2020] NSWSC 1379 Prince Alfred College Incorporated v ADC (2016) 258 CLR 134; [2016] HCA 37 Sweeney v Boylan Nominees Pty Ltd (2006) 226 CLR 161; [2006] HCA 19 The Council of Trinity Grammar School v Anderson (2019) 101 NSWLR 762; [2019] NSWCA 292 The Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church for the Diocese of Lismore v GLJ [2022] NSWCA 78 Walters v Cross-Country Fuels Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 10 Texts Cited: Not applicable Category: Principal judgment Parties: BTM1 (Plaintiff/Respondent) The Scouts Association of Australia New South Wales Branch (Defendant/Applicant) Representation: Counsel: D Campbell SC / C Simpson (Plaintiff/Respondent) N Hutley SC / J Sleight / E Dunlop (Defendant/Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate