NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Castle v Achdjian [2022] NSWSC 1340 Hearing dates: 19-20 September 2022 Date of orders: 4 October 2022 Decision date: 04 October 2022 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Darke J Decision: Application for extinguishment of right of carriageway refused. Orders to be made for removal of obstructions of right of carriageway. Catchwords: REAL PROPERTY – easements – extinguishment of easements – Cross-Claim seeking extinguishment of right of carriageway pursuant to Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) s 89(1) on the grounds of obsolescence, impediment of reasonable user of servient tenement, or abandonment – where right of carriageway has never been used as a means of vehicular access to the dominant tenement – where several obstructions have been erected on right of carriageway – where evidence suggests that right of carriageway has been used historically only as a footway – whether right of carriageway obsolete in circumstances where Council approval for construction of a driveway is very unlikely to be given – whether it is possible to reasonably enjoy servient tenement while right of carriageway subsists – whether acts or omissions of previous dominant owners evinced an intention to abandon right of carriageway in whole or in part – held that right of carriageway not obsolete, inconsistent with reasonable use of servient tenement, or abandoned in whole or in part – held further that dominant owners would suffer a substantial injury if right of carriageway were extinguished – defendants to be ordered to remove obstructions placed on right of carriageway without dominant owners' assent Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 88B, s 89(1), s 181A(1), sch 8 Cases Cited: Ashoil Holdings Pty Ltd v Fassoulas (2005) 12 BPR 23,525; [2005] NSWCA 80 Coffill v Lagudi Holdings Pty Ltd (2016) 18 BPR 36,483; [2016] NSWSC 1764 Durian (Holdings) Pty Ltd v Cavacourt Pty Ltd (2000) 10 BPR 18,099; [2000] NSWCA 28 Finlayson v Campbell (1997) 8 BPR 15,703 Guth v Robinson (1977) 1 BPR 9209 Grill v Hockey (1991) 5 BPR 11,421 Heaton v Loblay (1959) 60 SR (NSW) 332 Keefe v Amor [1965] 1 QB 334 Keewatin Power Co Ltd v Lake of the Woods Milling Co Ltd [1930] AC 640 Mogensen v Portuland Developments Pty Ltd (1983) NSW ConvR 55-116 Pieper v Edwards [1982] 1 NSWLR 336 Powell v Langdon (1944) 45 SR (NSW) 136 Proprietors Strata Plan No 9968 v Proprietors Strata Plan No 11173 [1979] 2 NSWLR 605 Prospect County Council v Cross (1990) 21 NSWLR 601 Re Mason and the Conveyancing Act [1962] NSWR 762 Re RK Roseblade and VM Roseblade and the Conveyancing Act; Re KS Foenander and the Conveyancing Act [1964-5] NSWR 2044 Sertari Pty Ltd v Nirimba Developments Pty Ltd (2008) NSW ConvR 56-200; [2007] NSWCA 324 Sheppard v Smith [2021] NSWSC 1207 Sheppard v Smith [2022] NSWCA 167 Treweeke v 36 Wolseley Road Pty Ltd (1973) 128 CLR 274 Trewin v Felton (2007) 13 BPR 24,579; [2007] NSWSC 851 Tujilo Pty Ltd v Watts (2005) 12 BPR 23,257; [2005] NSWSC 209 Walker v Bridgewood (2006) 12 BPR 23,537; [2006] NSWSC 149 Texts Cited: Justinian, Institutes Category: Principal judgment Parties: Andrew Donald Castle (First Plaintiff/First Cross-Defendant) Jessica Anne Castle (Second Plaintiff/Second Cross-Defendant) Vatche Achdjian (First Defendant/First Cross-Claimant) Lena Achdjian (Second Defendant/Second Cross-Claimant) Representation: Counsel: Ms LA Walsh (Plaintiffs/Cross-Defendants) Mr B Connell (Defendants/Cross-Claimants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate