NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: O'Brien v R [2022] NSWCCA 234 Hearing dates: 7 September 2022 Decision date: 04 November 2022 Before: Mitchelmore JA at [1]; Button J at [2]; Wright J at [41] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal against sentence refused. Catchwords: CRIME – Appeals – Appeal against sentence – Dishonestly obtain financial advantage – Manifest excess – Where "exceptional hardship" specifically conceded not to exist before sentencing judge – Manifest excess ground not sustained – Leave to appeal refused Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Cases Cited: R v Edwards (1996) 90 A Crim R 510 Totaan v R [2022] NSWCCA 75 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Patrick O'Brien (Applicant) Rex (Crown) Representation: Counsel: S Kluss (Applicant) E Wilkins SC (Crown)
Solicitors: Ross Hill and Associate Solicitors (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Crown) File Number(s): 2020/155965; 2020/177699; 2020/194339; 2020/198790; 2020/147279; 2020/215291 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of NSW Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 17 December 2021 Before: Ingram SC DCJ File Number(s): 2020/155965; 2020/177699; 2020/194339; 2020/198790; 2020/147279; 2020/215291
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate