NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Lawson v Minister for Environment and Water [2022] NSWLEC 122 Hearing dates: 30 September 2022 Date of orders: 6 October 2022 Decision date: 06 October 2022 Jurisdiction: Class 3 Before: Moore J Decision: See orders at [42] Catchwords: JOINDER - claim for compensation for resumption in 1922 of land at Lake Victoria in far south‑western New South Wales - claimant an Aboriginal person - claim advanced on two bases - first claim based on extinguishment of native title rights - second claim based on adverse possession - claim made against South Australian and New South Wales governments - claim opposed by both governments - both bases of claim opposed - claim founded on rights said to be held by claimant's grandmother at time of resumption - 2015 native title determination recognises native title rights as existing on land surrounding resumed land - native title rights those of the Barkandji and Malyangapa Peoples - determination lists apical ancestors from whom the native title rights are derived - native title rights held by Barkandji Native Title Group Aboriginal Corporation (Corporation) as trustee for descendants of listed apical ancestors - apical ancestors include three members of the Maraura, a subgrouping of the Barkandji and Malyangapa Peoples - three Maraura apical ancestors nominated by claimant in pleadings - claimant is descendant of one of the three Maraura apical ancestors - question of whether Corporation should be joined as a party to the proceedings - joinder sought by Corporation - joinder opposed by claimant - tests for joinder considered - rights of descendants of all three Maraura apical ancestors affected by claimant's native title claim - Corporation may have responsibilities with respect to those rights - potential for Corporation to have responsibility more than a mere possibility - joinder of Corporation appropriate - Corporation joined as Third Respondent COSTS - costs of joinder deferred to outcome of primary proceedings SUBPOENA - subpoena issued to the Corporation by the claimant - Corporation applies to have subpoena set aside in part - Corporation's subpoena challenge deferred pending outcome of joinder proceedings FUTURE CONDUCT OF PROCEEDINGS - future conduct of proceedings adjourned to permit Corporation to consider what role it proposed to take in the primary proceedings and whether it maintained its opposition to the claimant's subpoena - short adjournment permits retention of hearing dates set for February 2023 Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 56 and 57 Native Title Act 1993 (Cwth) Native Title (Prescribed Bodies Corporate) Regulation 1999 (Cwth) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 6.24 Cases Cited: John Alexander 's Clubs Pty Ltd v White City Tennis Club Ltd (2010) 241 CLR 1; [2010] HCA 19 Lawson v South Australian Minister for Water and the River Murray [2014] NSWLEC 158 Lawson v South Australian Minister for Water and the River Murray (No 2) [2014] NSWLEC 189 Lawson v South Australian Minister for Water and the River Murray [2017] NSWLEC 62 Lawson v Minister for Environment and Water (South Australia) and the State of New South Wales [2022] NSWLEC 50 Lawson v Minister for Environment and Water (2020) 19 BPR 40,215; [2020] NSWSC 186 Lawson v Minister for Environment & Water (SA) (2021) 388 ALR 335; [2021] NSWCA 6 Ross v Lane Cove Council (2014) 86 NSWLR 34; [2014] NSWCA 50 Victoria v Sutton (1998) 195 CLR 291; [1998] HCA 56 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Ms Dorothy Lawson (Applicant) Minister for Environment and Water (First Respondent) State of New South Wales (Second Respondent) Barkandji Native Title Group Aboriginal Corporation (Subpoenaed Party) Representation: Counsel: Mr D Yarrow, barrister (Applicant) Mr W Ambrose, barrister (First Respondent) Mr J Waters SC (Second Respondent) Ms C Taggart, barrister (Subpoenaed Party)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate