NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Gu v Kam & Beadman Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 1350 Hearing dates: 19, 20, 21, 29 September 2022 Date of orders: 29 September 2022 Decision date: 06 October 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Adamson J Decision: (1) Judgment for the defendants. (2) Order the plaintiff to pay the defendants' costs of the proceedings, including any reserved costs. Catchwords: NEGLIGENCE — Duty of care — Particular relationships — accountant and client — factual case — whether negligent advice given — where evidence showed such advice not given EVIDENCE — credibility — importance of contemporaneous documents Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), s 5D Duties Act 1997 (NSW), ss 68, 163B, 163H Taxation Administration Act 1996 (Cth), s 50 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 42.1 Cases Cited: Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118; [2003] HCA 22 Onassis v Vergottis [1968] 2 Lloyds Rep 403 Rippon v Chilcotin (2001) 53 NSWLR 198; [2001] NSWCA 142 The Nominal Defendant v Cordin [2017] NSWCA 6 Watson v Foxman (1995) 49 NSWLR 315 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Qingrong Gu (Plaintiff) Kam and Beadman Pty Ltd (First Defendant) Robert Kam and Nigel Stuart William Beadman trading as Kam and Beadman (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: D Priestley SC (Plaintiff) D Lloyd SC / G Marsden (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate