NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Alameddine v R [2022] NSWCCA 219 Hearing dates: 23 September 2022 Date of orders: 23 September 2022 Decision date: 07 October 2022 Before: Beech-Jones CJ at CL Hamill J N Adams J Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal to both applicants under s 5F(3)(a) of the Criminal Appeal Act 1912; (2) Appeal allowed; (3) Set aside the order made by his Honour Judge Hoy SC on 15 September 2022 refusing each applicant leave under s 132A(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) to apply for an order they be tried by a Judge alone; (4) Grant each applicant leave under s 132A(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) leave to apply for an order they be tried by a Judge alone; (5) Pursuant to s 132(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 order that each applicant be tried by a Judge alone; (6) To the extent necessary, remit the balance of the proceedings to the District Court. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – appeal from interlocutory order – refusal of trial judge to grant leave to apply for trial by a judge alone less than 28 days prior to the date fixed for the trial – Crown opposed leave but if leave granted consented to order – accepted that application did not involve "judge shopping" – trial judge refused application because of "appearance" of judge shopping – trial judge erred in not considering that one accused could not apply earlier because other accused did not consent – trial judge erred in acting on basis that appearance of judge shopping could remain where it was accepted that neither applicant engaged in judge shopping – appeal allowed – leave granted – orders for judge alone trial made Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Cases Cited: House v King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 R v Dawson [2022] NSWSC 552 R v Jenkin [2018] NSWSC 634 R v Perry (1993) 29 NSWLR 589 R v Quami & Ors (No 14) [2016] NSWSC 274 R v Simmons; R v Moore (2015) 249 A Crim R 120; [2015] NSWSC 259 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Hamdi Andrew Alameddine (Applicant) Rafat Alameddine (Applicant) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms A Francis (Hamdi Alameddine) Mr D Dalton SC (Rafat Alameddine) Ms M Kumar (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate