NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: SafeWork NSW v Bennett (No.2) [2022] NSWDC 453 Hearing dates: 4 October 2022 Date of orders: 7 October 2022 Decision date: 07 October 2022 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Russell SC DCJ Decision: In District Court proceedings 2020/303207 (s 19(1) Summons): (1) Mr Nigel Bennett was convicted on 12 August 2022. (2) Order Mr Nigel Bennett to pay a fine of $2,500. (3) Order pursuant to Section 122(2) of the Fines Act 1996 (NSW) that 50% of the fine is to be paid to the prosecutor. (4) Order Mr Nigel Bennett to pay the prosecutor's costs. In District Court proceedings 2020/303225 (s 19(2) Summons): (1) Mr Nigel Bennett was convicted on 12 August 2022. (2) Order Mr Nigel Bennett to pay a fine of $12,500. (3) Order pursuant to Section 122(2) of the Fines Act 1996 (NSW) that 50% of the fine is to be paid to the prosecutor. (4) Order Mr Nigel Bennett to pay the prosecutor's costs. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – prosecution – work health and safety – duty of persons undertaking business – risk of death or serious injury SENTENCE – objective seriousness – mitigating factors – aggravating factors – plea of guilty – general deterrence – specific deterrence – capacity to pay appropriate penalty – parity – totality COSTS – prosecution costs OTHER – defendant engaged as a contractor to operate a crane to load a dismantled centrifuge onto a flatbed truck – boom of the crane came into contact with, or in close proximity to, live overhead power lines – two persons suffered electric shocks – failure to forbid unqualified worker operating crane – failure to provide an appropriately qualified crane driver – failure to instruct worker to undertake site induction – failure to undertake joint safety assessment – failure to ensure crane was not in the vicinity of overhead power lines – failure to require dedicated spotter and/or qualified dogman – failure to conduct site-specific risk assessment Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 3A, 21A, Fines Act 1996 (NSW), ss 6, 122 Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW), ss 3, 19, 32 Cases Cited: Baumer v R [1988] HCA 67; (1988) 166 CLR 51 Bulga Underground Operations Pty Limited v Nash [2016] NSWCCA 37; (2016) 93 NSWLR 338 BW v R [2011] NSWCCA 176 Camilleri's Stock Feeds Pty Ltd v EPA (1993) 32 NSWLR 683 Capral Aluminium Limited v WorkCover Authority of New South Wales [2000] NSWIRComm 71; (2000) 49 NSWLR 610 DPP v Gregory [2011] VSCA 145; (2011) 34 VR 1 EPA v Barnes [2006] NSWCCA 246 Green v The Queen [2011] HCA 49; (2011) 244 CLR 462 Jimmy v The Queen [2010] NSWCCA 60; (2010) 77 NSWLR 540 Johnson v The Queen [2004] HCA 15; (2004) 78 ALJR 616 Mahdi Jahandideh v The Queen [2014] NSWCCA 178 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; (2005) 228 CLR 357 Mill v The Queen [1988] HCA 70; (1988) 166 CLR 59 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; (2011) 244 CLR 120 Nash v Silver City Drilling (NSW) Pty Limited; Attorney General for NSW v Silver City Drilling (NSW) Pty Limited [2017] NSWCCA 96 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 R v McNaughton [2006] NSWCCA 242; (2006) 66 NSWLR 566 R v Wilkinson (No. 5) [2009] NSWSC 432 SafeWork NSW v Arkwood (Gloucester) Pty Limited (No. 2) [2022] NSWDC 201 SafeWork NSW v Bennett [2022] NSWDC 332 SafeWork NSW v Elgas Ltd [2021] NSWDC 101 Unity Pty Limited v SafeWork NSW [2018] NSWCCA 266 Veen v The Queen (No. 2) [1988] HCA 14; (1988) 164 CLR 465 WorkCover Authority (Inspector Howard) v Baulderstone Hornibrook Pty Limited [2009] NSWIRComm 92; (2009) 186 IR 125 WorkCover Authority of NSW (Inspector Carmody) v Consolidated Constructions Pty Limited [2001] NSWIR Comm 263; (2001) 109 IR 316 Category: Sentence Parties: SafeWork NSW (Prosecutor) Nigel Bennett (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Scott (Prosecutor) N Bennett (Self-represented) (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate