NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Harland v Murphy [2022] NSWSC 1376 Hearing dates: 3, 22 March, 26-27 April 2022 Date of orders: 12 October 2022 Decision date: 12 October 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: N Adams J Decision: (1) Grant an extension of time to the plaintiff to commence proceedings under r 59.10(2) of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005. (2) Declare that search warrant number 81 of 2019 issued on 8 April 2019 at Blacktown Local Court is invalid. (3) The decision by Adele Andrews, Registrar at Blacktown Local Court, to issue search warrant number 81 of 2019 on 8 April 2019 is quashed. (4) The first defendant is to pay to the plaintiff's costs of these proceedings on an ordinary basis. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – police powers – search warrant – whether invalid – where police attended plaintiff's residence in response to his triple-0 calls of threatened violence by neighbour – police shown notes on computer – APVO application made by plaintiff – search warrant executed on plaintiff's premises to seize computer and hardware – searchable offence nominated as Crimes Act s 314 – whether applicant had reasonable grounds under LEPRA s 47 – whether Local Court Registrar had reasonable grounds under LEPRA s 48 – other particulars of invalidity under LEPRA s 62(3) – where Registrar appeared to indicate less than one minute spent considering search warrant application – applicant did not have reasonable grounds – search warrant declared invalid and its issue quashed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 314, 319, 326, 547B Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW), s 49A Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), s 179 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 138 Law Enforcement (Police Responsibilities) Act 2002 (NSW), Pt 5 Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Regulation 2016 (NSW) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), ss 69, 75 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 59.10 Cases Cited: Baker v Campbell (1983) 153 CLR 52; [1983] HCA 39 Beneficial Finance Corporation v Commissioner of Australian Federal Police (1991) 31 FCR 523; [1991] FCA 92 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 Caratti v Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police [2017] FCAFC 177 Carrol & Ors v Mijoivch & Ors (1991) 25 NSWLR 441 Corbett & Anor v State of New South Wales [2006] NSWCA 138 Doyle v Commissioner of Police [2020] NSWCA 11; 285 A Crim R 349 Dyason v Butterworth [2015] NSWCA 52 George v Rockett (1990) 170 CLR 104; [1990] HCA 26 Lee v NSW Commissioner of Police (No.3) [2019] NSWSC 694 Neeta (Epping) Pty Ltd v Phillips (1974) 131 CLR 286 Parker v Churchill (1985) 9 FCR 316 Polley v Johnson [2015] NSWCA 256 Rohozynsky v Holder & ors. [2005] NSWSC 868 Smethurst v Commissioner of Police (Cth) [2020] HCA 14 State of New South Wales v Corbett (2017) 230 CLR 606; [2007] HCA 32 Vincent v Randall & Anor [1999] NSWSC 833 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Gregory Harland (Plaintiff) Senior Constable Ashlea Murphy (First Defendant) Adele Andrews, Registrar, Blacktown Local Court (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr P Skinner (Plaintiff) Ms D New (First Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate