NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Artkal Trading Pty Limited v Next Constructions Pty Ltd [2021] NSWDC 819 Hearing dates: 24 and 25 June 2021 Date of orders: 6 July 2021 Decision date: 06 July 2021 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: P Taylor SC DCJ Decision: (1) Judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant in the sum of $209,736.95. (2) Order the defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs. (3) In the event that the defendant seeks to apply for a stay of the judgment, liberty to apply by email to my associate within 14 days. Catchwords: BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION — adjudication – payment claim — payment schedule – misleading representation – reliance – injunction Legislation Cited: Australian Consumer Law, s 4, s 237 Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999, s 11, s 13, s, 14, s 15, s 31 Electronic Transactions Act 2000, s 13A Interpretation Act 1987, s 8 Cases Cited: Bitannia Pty Ltd v Parkline Constructions Pty Ltd (2006) 67 NSWLR 9 Butcher v Lachlan Elder Realty Pty Ltd (2004) 218 CLR 592; [2004] HCA 60 Marks v GIO Australia Holdings Ltd (1998) 196 CLR 494 State Asphalt Services Pty Ltd v Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd [2013] NSWSC 528 Storm Industries Pty Ltd trading as trustee of the T&L Trust v Unicar Australia Pty Ltd [2020] NSWDC 51 Structum Pty Ltd v Basilios Mihalopoulos & CWCN Pty Ltd [2019] NSWDC 119 Wallace v Kam [2013] HCA 19 Wardley Australia Ltd v Western Australia (1992) 175 CLR 514 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Artkal Trading Pty Limited (plaintiff) Next Constructions Pty Ltd (defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr M Sahade (plaintiff) Mr T L Hollo (defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate