NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: King v Brown (No 4) [2022] NSWSC 1402 Hearing dates: 13 October 2022 Date of orders: 17 October 2022 Decision date: 17 October 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Schmidt AJ Decision: 1. The judgment for CAD2,134,924 made on 2 September 2021 in orders 1, 4 and 7 be corrected by being reduced by CAD2,030,903.90 to CAD104,020.10, effective from the time that the orders were made. 2. There be no order as to the costs of the motion. Catchwords: JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS — Amending, varying and setting aside — Correction under slip rule —where proceeds of sales mistakenly not taken into account in original orders made — where error occurred as a result of inadvertence by legal representative — original orders corrected COSTS — no costs order pursued against legal representative — no order as to costs made Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 36.17 Cases Cited: Brown v King [2022] NSWCA 75 King v Brown [2020] NSWSC 1010 King v Brown (No 2) [2021] NSWSC 1060 King v Brown (No 3) [2021] NSWSC 1116 L Shaddock & Associates Pty Ltd v Parramatta City Council (No 2) (1982) 151 CLR 590; [1982] HCA 59 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mr S King (Plaintiff) Mr G Brown (First Defendant) Mrs B Brown (Second Defendant) Riverpines Vineyard Pty Ltd CAN 093 689 804 (Receiver and Manager Appointed) (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr P Newton (Plaintiff) Mr M Hazan (Plaintiff)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate