NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Lin v R [2023] NSWCCA 304 Hearing dates: 3 November 2023 Decision date: 29 November 2023 Before: Ward P at [1]; Rothman J at [2]; Davies J at [69] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted. (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME – sentence appeal – finding of lack of remorse based on lack of candour – finding open – finding of attempts to minimise role – finding open – parity – no error – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth); s 11.2A(1) Customs Act 1901 (Cth); s 233BABAD(2) Cases Cited: BP v R [2010] NSWCCA 159; (2010) 201 A Crim R 379 Brzozowski v The King [2023] NSWCCA 129 L Vogel & Son Pty Ltd v Anderson (1968) 120 CLR 157; [1968] HCA 90 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259; [1996] HCA 6 Neal v The Queen (1982) 149 CLR 305; [1982] HCA 55 Patel v R [2022] NSWCCA 93, (2022) 366 FLR 314 R v Lyon (1906) 3 CLR 770; [1906] HCA 17 Raptis, Lilimbakis & Sinclair v R (1988) 36 A Crim R 362 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Bingchun Lin (Applicant) Rex (Crown) Representation: Counsel: J S Stratton SC (Applicant) A Chhabra / R Thampapillai (Crown)
Solicitors: Dwellaw (Applicant) Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2020/00356594 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 26 May 2023 Before: Wass SC DCJ File Number(s): 2020/00356594
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate