NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Day v Caithness [2022] NSWLEC 1577 Hearing dates: 26 July 2022 Date of orders: 26 July 2022 Decision date: 26 July 2022 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Douglas AC Decision: The Court orders: (1) The application is refused. Catchwords: TREES (DISPUTES BETWEEN NEIGHBOURS) – high hedges – Review of the Trees Act – trees severely obstructing sunlight before applicants' occupation – other causes of sunlight obstruction Legislation Cited: Interpretation Act 1987 Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 Pt 2A, s 14A, 14B, 14E, 14F Cases Cited: Barker v Kyriakides [2007] NSWLEC 292 Fryday v The Owners - Strata Plan No 15039 [2019] NSWLEC 1150 Grantham Holdings Pty Ltd v Miller [2011] NSWLEC 1122 Robson v Leischke (2008) 72 NSWLR 98; [2008] NSWLEC 152 Texts Cited: NSW Justice & Attorney General's Department 'Review of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 (NSW)' (November 2009) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Wendy Day (First Applicant) Brian Day (Second Applicant) Lee Caithness (First Respondent) David Caithness (Second Respondent) Representation: W Day (Self represented) (First Applicant) B Day (Self represented) (Second Applicant) L Caithness (Self represented) (First Respondent) D Caithness (Self represented) (Second Respondent) File Number(s): 2022/122064 Publication restriction: No
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate