NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Hickson; R v McDonald [2022] NSWSC 1450 Hearing dates: 24 October 2022 Date of orders: 26 October 2022 Decision date: 26 October 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Harrison J Decision: (1) Refuse Ms McDonald's application to recall Ms Speering. (2) Grant Ms McDonald's no case application with respect to Count 2. Catchwords: EVIDENCE – accessory after the fact to murder – whether sufficient evidence of actus reus to go to the jury – application to recall witness – whether in the interests of justice to do so Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 128 Cases Cited: Dawson v The Queen (1961) 106 CLR 1; [1961] HCA 74 Ewan v R [2020] NSWCCA 85 R v Dileski (2002) 132 A Crim R 408; [2002] NSWCCA 345 R v Stanford (Marcus) [2016] NSWSC 1174 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Rex (Crown) Maddison Hickson (Accused) Taylah Renae McDonald (Accused) Representation: Counsel: B Costello (Crown) P Krisenthal (Accused Hickson) P Rosser KC (Accused McDonald)
Solicitors: Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) Legal Aid (NSW) (Accused Hickson) Nowland Lawyers (Accused McDonald) File Number(s): 2021/13793; 2021/303481 Publication restriction: Nil
Judgment 1. HIS HONOUR: In advance of the Crown closing its case, the parties require adjudication on some evidentiary issues. These are dealt with in the reasons that follow in no particular order of significance.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate