NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Wang v Meng [2022] NSWCA 215 Hearing dates: 5 October 2022 Decision date: 26 October 2022 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1]; White JA at [2]; Basten AJA at [44] Decision: Summons filed on 29 July 2022 seeking leave to appeal is dismissed with costs Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – pleadings – amendment – grant of leave to amend after conclusion of hearing – application of s 63 of Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) – possibility of multiplicity of proceedings – absence of express reference to ss 56, 57, and 58 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) – no basis to interfere with judge's exercise of discretion to allow amendment Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 56, 57, 58, 64 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 63 Cases Cited: AON Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175; [2009] HCA 27 Cement Australia Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2010) 187 FCR 261; [2010] FCAFC 101 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Johnson v Mackinnon [2021] NSWCA 152 Macquarie Bank Ltd v National Mutual Life Association of Australia Ltd (1996) 40 NSWLR 543 The Age Company Ltd & Ors v Liu (2013) 82 NSWLR 268; [2013] NSWCA 26 Turner v Bladin (1951) 82 CLR 463; [1951] HCA 13 Young v Hones (No 2) [2014] NSWCA 338 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Binbin Wang (Appellant) Zihui Meng (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M Condon SC (Applicant) J Mee (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate