NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Xu v PBR Property Consultants Pty Limited [2022] NSWCATAP 334 Hearing dates: 10 October 2022 Date of orders: 27 October 2022 Decision date: 27 October 2022 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: I R Coleman SC ADCJ, Principal Member S Thode, Senior Member Decision: 1. Leave to appeal refused. 2. Appeal dismissed Catchwords: APPEAL – CONSUMER CLAIM – no issue of principle - failure by Appellant to request written reasons as directed – no demonstrable error Legislation Cited: Property, Stock and Business Agents Act 2002 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Cases Cited: Prendergast v Western Murray Irrigation Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 69 Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Mraz v The Queen [1955] HCA 59; [1955] 93 CLR 493 Gallagher v R [1986] HCA 26; [1986] 160 CLR 392 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Qian Xu - Appellant PBR Property Consultants Limited - Respondent Representation: Appellant (Self-represented) T Smith (Agent) (Respondent) File Number(s): 2022/00181549 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer Commercial Division Date of Decision: 25 May 2022 Before: H Smith, General Member File Number(s): GEN 22/13370
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate