NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Maclean v Brylewski [2022] NSWCA 217 Hearing dates: 14 October 2022 Decision date: 27 October 2022 Before: Ward P at [1]; White JA at [11]; Brereton JA at [44] Decision: Summons filed 30 August 2022 seeking leave to appeal is refused, with costs. Catchwords: APPEALS – procedural fairness – whether court below was bound to fix a date for the hearing of a notice of motion prior to the date of the final hearing – leave to appeal refused Legislation Cited: Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW) Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 66G Probate and Administration Act 1898 (NSW), s 44(1) Succession Act 2006 (NSW), Ch 3 Suitors' Fund Act 1951 (NSW) Cases Cited: Be Financial Pty Ltd v Das [2012] NSWCA 164 Carolan v AMF Bowling Pty Limited [1995] NSWCA 69 Coffs Harbour City Council v Noubia Pty Limited [2022] NSWCA 32 House v The King (1936) 55 NSWLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 In re The Will of FB Gilbert (1946) 46 SR (NSW) 318 Jaycar Pty Ltd v Lombardo [2011] NSWCA 284 Micallef v ICI Australia Operations Pty Ltd [2001] NSWCA 274 Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services v Smith (2017) 95 NSWLR 597; [2017] NSWCA 206 Zelden v Sewell; Henamast Pty Ltd v Sewell [2011] NSWCA 56 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jacqueline Maclean (Applicant) Maria Brylewski (First Respondent) Tadeusz Brylewski (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J E F Brown (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate