NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Maybury v R [2022] NSWCCA 233 Hearing dates: 1 August 2022 Date of orders: 04 November 2022 Decision date: 04 November 2022 Before: Gleeson JA at [1] Wright J at [3] Cavanagh J at [141] Decision: (1) The applicant has leave to make his application out of time. (2) The applicant has leave to appeal. (3) The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME – Appeals – Appeal against sentence – - Section 33(1)(a) of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) – Wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm – Determination of the objective seriousness of the offence – Sentencing judge made finding that injuries amounted to grievous bodily harm – Whether the principles in The Queen v De Simoni breached – Whether finding resulted in a miscarriage of justice – Sentencing judge entitled to take into account the injuries he did in the way he did Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 5, 33(1)(a), 33(1)(b), 35, 86(3), Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 3A(a), 3A(g), 53A(2) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5(1)(c) Supreme Court (Criminal Appeal) Rules 2021 (NSW), r 3.5(5) Cases Cited: Adams v R [2011] NSWCCA 47 AM v R [2012] NSWCCA 203; 225 A Crim R 481 Bourke v R [2010] NSWCCA 22; 199 A Crim R 38 Cao v R [2020] NSWCCA 223 Cheung v The Queen (2001) 209 CLR 1; [2001] HCA 67 Cryer v R [2010] NSWCCA 18 Dean v R [2019] NSWCCA 27 Einfeld v R [2010] NSWCCA 87; (2010) 200 A Crim R 1 Environment Protection Authority v Sydney Water Corporation [2019] NSWLEC 100 GL v R [2022] NSWCCA 202 Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 Lago v R [2015] NSWCCA 296 LN v R [2020] NSWCCA 131 Markarian v The Queen (2006) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 McCullough v R [2009] NSWCCA 94; 194 A Crim R 439 Muldrock v The Queen (2010) 244 CLR 120; [2011] HCA 39 Nguyen v The Queen (2016) 256 CLR 656; [2016] HCA 17 R v Isaacs (1997) 41 NSWLR 374; (1997) 90 A Crim R 587 R v Mitchell; R v Gallagher [2007] NSWCCA 296; 177 A Crim R 94 Ragg v R [2022] NSWCCA 150 The Queen v De Simoni (1981) 147 CLR 383; [1981] HCA 31 The Queen v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270; [1999] HCA 54 Turkmani v R [2014] NSWCCA 186; 244 A Crim R 402 Wilkins v R [2009] NSWCCA 222 Category: Principal judgment Parties: MF Maybury (Applicant) State of New South Wales (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: T Ramrakha (Applicant) E Wilkins SC (Respondent) Solicitors: Legal Aid NSW (Applicant) Office of the Director for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2018/184552 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 21 December 2020 Before: North DCJ File Number(s): 2018/184552
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate