NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Ceerose Pty Ltd v A-Civil Aust Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 1487 Hearing dates: 21 October 2022 Date of orders: 2 November 2022 Decision date: 02 November 2022 Jurisdiction: Equity - Technology and Construction List Before: Rees J Decision: Refuse application to extend interim injunction. Catchwords: BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION – adjudication determination – subcontractor entitled to some $190,000 – adjudicator makes finding for which neither contended – contractor seeks to quash determination and Grosvenor or Brodyn stay –suggested serious question has only modest prospects where no suggestion that finding was wrong and finding likely irrelevant – evidence to support stay slight – reluctant to continue interim injunction to permit contractor to obtain evidence to support stay in absence of serious question to be tried as to jurisdictional challenge – balance of convenience did not favour extension of injunction as, although the monies were in Court, the subcontractor was deprived of cashflow. Legislation Cited: Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW), ss 3, 12, 25, 32, 34 Cases Cited: Acciona Infrastructure Australia Pty Ltd v Holcim (Australia) Pty Ltd [2020] NSWSC 1330 Anderson Street Banksmeadow Pty Ltd v JCM Contracting Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 102 A-Tech Australia Pty Ltd v Top Pacific Construction Aust Pty Ltd (No 2) [2019] NSWSC 624 Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill (2006) 227 CLR 57; [2006] HCA 46 Beecham Group Ltd v Bristol Laboratories Pty Ltd (1968) 118 CLR 618 Bellerive Homes Pty Ltd v FW Projects Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 1435 Brodyn v Davenport (2004) 61 NSWLR 421; [2004] NSWCA 394 Grosvenor v Musico [2004] NSWSC 344; (2005) 21 BCL 266 Hakea Holdings Pty Limited v Denham Constructions Pty Ltd [2016] NSWSC 1120 Maxcon Constructions Pty Ltd v Vadasz (2018) 264 CLR 46; [2018] HCA 5 McNab Building Services Pty Ltd v Demex Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 1441 Mineralogy Pty Ltd v Sino Iron Pty Ltd [2016] WASCA 105 Multiplex Contractors Pty Ltd v Luikens [2003] NSWSC 1140 MZAPC v Minister for Immigration & Border Protection [2021] HCA 17; (2021) 390 ALR 590 Nathanson v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] HCA 26; (2022) 403 ALR 398 Phoenix Builders Pty Ltd v Deca Australia Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 581 Probuild Constructions (Aust) Pty Ltd v DDI Group Pty Ltd (2017) 95 NSWLR 82; [2017] NSWCA 151 Probuild Constructions (Aust) Pty Ltd v Shade Systems Pty Ltd (2018) 264 CLR 1; [2018] HCA 4 Samsung Electronics Co Ltd v Apple Inc (2011) 217 FCR 238; [2011] FCAFC 156 Shell Refining (Australia) Pty Ltd v AJ Mayr Engineering Pty Ltd [2006] NSWSC 94 Southern Han Breakfast Point Pty Ltd (in liq) v Lewence Construction Pty Ltd (2016) 260 CLR 340; [2016] HCA 52 TFM Epping Land Pty Ltd v Decon Australia Pty Ltd [2020] NSWCA 118 Trysams Pty Ltd v Club Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd [2007] NSWSC 941 Trysams Pty Ltd v Club Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 399 Warner-Lambert Co LCC v Apotex Pty Ltd [2014] FCAFC 59; (2014) 311 ALR 632 Texts Cited: New South Wales Legislative Assembly, Parliamentary Debates (Hansard), 12 November 2022 at 6542 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Ceerose Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) A-Civil Aust Pty Ltd (First Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr S Robertson SC / Mr M Keene (Plaintiff) Mr L Gor (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate