NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Bowie (No 4) [2022] NSWSC 1505 Hearing dates: 24 October 2022 Date of orders: 24 October 2022 Decision date: 04 November 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Yehia J Decision: I refuse the application to give the jury a Shepherd direction. Catchwords: Application to give the jury a "Shepherd" direction —What constitutes a "link in the chain" as opposed to "a strand in a cable" — Where the Crown relies solely on an intention to kill as the requisite intention for murder — Where the accused wife disappeared in 1982 and her body has not been found — Where the majority of facts relied upon go to establishing death and deliberate act or acts inflicted by the accused as opposed to an intention to kill-where a Shepherd direction may be redundant given that the jury will be directed that the Crown must prove each element of the offence beyond reasonable doubt Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 18(1)(a) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 65 Cases Cited: D'Agostino v Regina [2019] NSWCCA 259 Davidson v R [2009] NSWCCA 150; (2009) 75 NSWLR 150 Minniti v The Queen (2006) 196 FLR 431 R v Merritt [1999] NSWCCA 29 Shepherd v The Queen (1990) 170 CLR 573; [1990] HCA 56 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Rex (Crown) John Douglas Bowie (Accused) Representation: Counsel: A Morris (Crown) W Terracini SC (Accused) Solicitors: Department of Public Prosecution (Crown) LY Lawyers (Accused) File Number(s): 2019/00146792
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate