NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Markovsky v Teplitsky [2022] NSWCA 228 Hearing dates: 7 November 2022 Date of orders: 09 November 2022 Decision date: 09 November 2022 Before: Macfarlan JA Decision: Dismiss Ms Markovsky's notice of motion filed on 27 October 2022, with costs. Catchwords: REAL PROPERTY — application to extend operation of caveats — s 74K Real Property Act 1900 (NSW) — no reasonable basis for existence of interest claimed in caveats — no alternative arguable interest suggested Legislation Cited: Real Property Act 1900 (NSW), s 74K Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 31(3) Cases Cited: Tadrous v Tadrous [2009] NSWSC 407 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Lynelle Markovsky (Applicant/Appellant) Michael Teplitsky (First Respondent) Zone Developments Pty Limited (Second Respondent) Spring Street Property Group Pty Limited (Third Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Epstein SC/ G Tsang (Applicant) M Cairns (Respondents)
Solicitors: Baron + Associates (Appellant) Equium Lawyers (Respondents) File Number(s): 2022/289340 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Supreme Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Equity Division Citation: [2022] NSWSC 1164 Date of Decision: 31 August 2022 Before: Stevenson J File Number(s): 2022/135582
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate