NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Demkin v Koster [2022] NSWLEC 1633 Hearing dates: 4 November 2022 Date of orders: 15 November 2022 Decision date: 15 November 2022 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Bish C Decision: The Court orders that: (1) The Pt 2A application is refused. (2) All exhibits are returned. Catchwords: TREES (DISPUTES BETWEEN NEIGHBOURS) – whether the applicant made reasonable effort – high hedge – is the obstruction of sunlight severe Legislation Cited: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006, Pt 2A, ss 14A, 14B, 14C, 14E, 14F Category: Principal judgment Parties: J Demkin (Applicant) H Koster (First Respondent) C Koster (Second Respondent) Representation: J Demkin (Applicant) (Self-represented) H Koster (First Respondent) (Self-represented) C Koster (Second Respondent) (Self-represented) File Number(s): 2022/238403 Publication restriction: No
Judgment 1. COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal brought by Jennifer Demkin (the applicant) against Harry Koster and Christina Koster (the respondents), an adjoining neighbour, pursuant to Pt 2A, s 14B of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 (the Trees Act), seeking orders to prune trees that form a hedge, north of her common boundary. 2. The applicant seeks for the respondent to prune and maintain the trees, identified as T1 to T18 in the application, to a height equivalent to the roof of an adjoining neighbours shed which are considered by her to cause a severe obstruction of sunlight to her dwelling.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate