NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Sande v R [2022] NSWCCA 236 Hearing dates: 6 July 2022 Date of orders: 6 July 2022 Decision date: 18 November 2022 Before: Meagher JA at [1]; Fullerton J at [2]; Ierace J at [3] Decision: Reasons published for order made on 6 July 2022: 1) The application for leave to appeal is refused. Catchwords: CRIME – Appeals – Appeal against sentence – Application for leave to appeal – Manifest excess – Where applicant sentenced to a term of imprisonment for one count of supplying a prohibited drug – Whether sentence manifestly excessive – Where applicant submitted that the nominal starting point of the sentence was outside the appropriate range – Consideration of comparable cases and sentencing statistics relied on by the applicant Legislation Cited: Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 (NSW), s 124I Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 44 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), s 25 Cases Cited: Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 249 CLR 571; [2013] HCA 37 Donaghey v R [2015] NSWCCA 119 Obeid v R (2017) 96 NSWLR 155; [2017] NSWCCA 221 Pham v R [2017] NSWCCA 75 Sahyoun v R [2020] NSWCCA 87 Sahyoun v R (No 2) [2020] NSWCCA 95 Vandeventer v R [2013] NSWCCA 33 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Kamil Sande (Applicant) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Schaudin (Applicant) A L Bonnor (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate