NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Jarvis v Allianz Australia Insurance Limited [2022] NSWCA 232 Hearing dates: 20 July 2022 Date of orders: 15 November 2022 Decision date: 15 November 2022 Before: Bell CJ at [1]; Brereton JA at [2]; Basten AJA at [32]. Decision: Dismiss the appeal, with costs. Catchwords: INSURANCE – Liability insurance – Motor vehicle – Compulsory third-party insurance – Appeal from judicial review of medical assessment review panel decision – Whether accident caused psychiatric injury – Whether degree of whole person impairment greater than 10% ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Whether medical assessment review panel failed to respond to substantial argument regarding temporal connection between accident and PTSD symptoms – No jurisdictional error found Legislation Cited: Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW), Pts 3.4 and 4, ss 44, 58, 61, 63, 65, 131 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 69 Cases Cited: Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v Cervantes [2012] NSWCA 244; (2012) 61 MVR 443 Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2003) 214 CLR 496; [2003] HCA 26 Rodger v De Gelder [2015] NSWCA 211; (2015) 71 MVR Wingfoot Australia Partners Pty Ltd v Kocak (2013) 252 CLR 480; [2013] HCA 43 Texts Cited: NSW State Insurance Regulatory Authority (SIRA), Motor Accident Permanent Impairment Guidelines (1 June 2018), cll 1.6, 1.7 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Maxwell Jarvis (Appellant) Allianz Australia Insurance Limited (First Respondent) The President of the Personal Injury Commission of New South Wales (Second Respondent) Samson Roberts, Anthony Samuels and Sharon Reutens as a Review Panel constituted under s 63 of the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (Third Respondent) Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate