NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Renown Corporation Pty Ltd v SEMF Pty Ltd [2022] NSWCA 233 Hearing dates: 29 June 2022 Date of orders: 15 November 2022 Decision date: 15 November 2022 Before: Meagher JA at [1]; Brereton JA at [2]; Mitchelmore JA at [43]. Decision: Dismiss the appeal, with costs. Catchwords: CONTRACTS – Remedies – Damages – Time of assessment – Contract for supply and installation of software system – Where system delivered was defective – Whether primary judge erred in assessing damages as at date of hearing rather than date of breach – No contention that plaintiff unreasonably failed to mitigate its losses by delaying rectification or replacement – No error in assessing damages as at date of hearing CONTRACTS – Remedies – Damages – Measure of damages – Whether primary judge erred in assessing damages as costs of replacing defective system with new upgraded system, instead of costs of rectifying individual defects – Common ground that most efficient and cost-effective approach was replacement with newer system – Betterment – Onus on defendant to prove any amount saved by plaintiff due to upgrade – No error in primary judge's approach Legislation Cited: Nil Cases Cited: Bellgrove v Eldridge (1954) 90 CLR 613; [1954] HCA 36 Bevan Investments v Blackhall & Struthers (1978) 11 BLR 78 Brit Inns Ltd v BDW Trading Ltd [2012] EWHC 2143 (TCC) Cory & Son v Wingate Investments (1981) 17 BLR 104 East Ham Corp v Bernard Sunley [1966] AC 406 Imperial College of Science and Technology v Norman & Dawbarn (1986) 12 Constr LJ 280 Johnson v Perez (1988) 166 CLR 351; [1988] HCA 64 Radford v de Froberville [1977] 1 WLR 1262 Robinson v. Harman (1848) 1 Exch 850 Ruthol Pty Ltd v Tricon (Australia) Pty Ltd [2005] NSWCA 443 Tabcorp Holdings Ltd v Bowen Investments Pty Ltd (2009) 236 CLR 272; [2009] HCA 8 Tyco Australia Pty Ltd v Optus Networks Pty Ltd [2004] NSWCA 333 Texts Cited: The Hon Justice James Edelman, McGregor on Damages (21st ed, 2021, Sweet & Maxwell) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Renown Corporation Pty Ltd (First Appellant) Dialog Pty Ltd (Second Appellant) SEMF Pty Ltd (Respondent) Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate