NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Cuscito v Ludovic Chaumont t/as L C Roofing and Carpentry [2022] NSWCATAP 359 Hearing dates: 8 November 2022 Date of orders: 15 November 2022 Decision date: 15 November 2022 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: R C Titterton OAM, Senior Member A Boxall, Senior Member Decision: (1) Leave to appeal is refused. (2) The appeal is otherwise dismissed. Catchwords: APPEALS – leave to appeal – no question of principle Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) – 80; cl 12 of Sch 4 Cases Cited: Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Nikic v Volkswagen Group Australia Pty Ltd [2022] NSWCATAP 302 Prendergast v Western Murray Irrigation Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 69 Temple v AMR Motors Pty Limited [2017] NSWCATAP 221 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: Joseph Cuscito (Appellant) Ludovic Chaumont t/as L C Roofing and Carpentry (Respondent) Representation: Appellant (Self Represented) Respondent (Self Represented) File Number(s): 2022/00260347 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Citation: N/A Date of Decision: 6 August 2022 Before: H Smith, General Member File Number(s): HB 22/25482
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate