NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: GIBSON, Scott — Application under Part 7 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2022] NSWSC 1577 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 09 November 2022 Decision date: 17 November 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Yehia J Decision: The application of Scott Gibson filed on 18 January 2022 pursuant to s 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) is refused Catchwords: Crime — Appeal and review — Application to Supreme Court for inquiry into conviction under Part 7 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 — Knowingly contravening a restriction in an Apprehended Violence Order (AVO) — Three convictions — Sentenced to a Conditional Release Order for six months — Whether it appears that there is a doubt or question as to guilt, as to any mitigating circumstances in the case as to any part of the evidence in the case Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) ss 78, 79 Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW) ss 13, 14 Cases Cited: Application by AZ for inquiry into conviction pursuant to s 78 of the Crimes Appeal and Review Act 2001 (NSW) [2020] NSWSC 1048 Application by Christopher Cranney pursuant to s 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) [2022] NSWSC 1005 Application by Crespin Adanguidi pursuant to s 78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) [2022] NSWSC 442 Application of Paul Nardelli under Section 474D Crimes Act 1900 [2006] NSWSC 967 Application of Peter James Holland under s.78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2008] NSWSC 251 Gibson v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (No 2) [2021] NSWCA 218 Pavel Svanda under Part 7, s 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) [2021] NSWSC 1061 Potier – Application for an inquiry into conviction pursuant to s 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2018] NSWSC 768 Sinkovich v Attorney General of New South Wales (2013) 85 NSWLR 783 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Scott Gibson (Applicant) Attorney General of New South Wales (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Scott Gibson (Self-represented) Katrina Curry (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate