NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Health Care Complaints Commission v Robinson (No 2) [2022] NSWCATOD 151 Hearing dates: 13 September 2022 Date of orders: 24 November 2022 Decision date: 24 November 2022 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: Le Poer Trench ADCJ, Principal Member Associate Prof I Rewell, Senior Member Dr G Thomson, Senior Member J Houen, General Member Decision: 1. The Respondent is found to be guilty of unsatisfactory professional conduct (s 139B(1)(a)) and professional misconduct (s 139E). 2. The matter is to be listed for Stage 2 determination on 8 December 2022. Catchwords: HEALTH – Further hearing as directed by NSW Court of Appeal – professional registration and discipline – disciplinary proceedings – stage 1 decision – unsatisfactory professional conduct – professional misconduct Legislation Cited: Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) Cases Cited: Chen v Health Care Complaints Commission [2017] NSWCA 186 Chiropractic Board of Australia v Ebtash [2020] WASAT 86 Ford v Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd (No 3) [2020] FCA 1784. Health Care Complaints Commission v Do [2014] NSWCA 307 Health Care Complaints Commission v Jamnagarwalla [2022] NSWCATOD 61 Health Care Complaints Commission v Priyamanna [2015] NSWCATOD 138 Health Care Complaints Commission Complaints Commission v Robinson [2022] NSWCA 164 Health Care Complaints Commission v Sultan [2018] NSWCA 303 Health Care Complaints Commission v Yildirim [2021] NSWCATOD 146 King v Health Care Complaint Commission [2011] NSWCA 353 Poniatowska v Hickinbotham [2009] FCA 680 R v Court [1988] 2 All ER 221 R v Drago (1992) 63 A Crim R 59 R v Harkin (1989) 38 Crim R 296 R v Hayward [2019] QCA 91 R v Jones (2011) 209 A Crim R 379 R v Zaidi 57 A Crim R 189 Vitality Works Australia Pty Ltd v Yelda (No 2) [2021] NSWCA 147 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Health Care Complaints Commission (Applicant) David Isaac Matzner Robinson (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Lowson (Applicant) R Mathur SC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate