NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Apulu v R [2022] NSWCCA 244 Hearing dates: 14 October 2022 Date of orders: 23 November 2022 Decision date: 23 November 2022 Before: Simpson AJA [1] Davies J [49] Wilson J [54] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal is granted; 2. The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME – appeal against sentence – robbery whilst armed – robbery upon service station attendant – question of misapplication of guideline judgment – question of the parity principle where the co-offender was sentence in the Children's Court – question of manifest excess – question of the distinction between aggravating factors and the assessment of objective gravity Legislation Cited: Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Cases Cited: Aslan v R [2014] NSWCCA 114 Belvie v R [2017] NSWCCA 36 Bugmy v R (2013) 249 CLR 571 Butters v R [2010] NSWCCA 1 DPP (Cth) v De La Rosa (2010) 79 NSWLR 1; [2010] NSWCCA 19 Govinden [1999] NSWCCA 118; (1999) 106 A Crim R 314 Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 462; [2011] HCA 49 Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 520; [2010] HCA 45 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Imbornone v R [2017] NSWCCA 144 Johan v R [2015] NSWCCA 58 Lowe v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 606; [1984] HCA 46 Lowndes v The Queen (1999) 195 CLR 665; [1999] HCA 29 Obeid v R (2017) 96 NSWLR 155; [2017] NSWCCA 221 Postiglione v The Queen; (1997) 189 CLR 295; [1997] HCA 26 Pritchard v R [2022] NSWCCA 130 R v Boney [2001] NSWCCA 432 R v Colgan [1999] NSWCCA 292 R v Crotty (Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW), 29 February 1994, unrep) R v Diamond (NSW Court of Criminal Appeal, 18 February 1993, Unrep) R v Dougan [2006] 160 A Crim R 135 R v Elyard [2006] NSWCCA 43 R v Engert (1995) 84 A Crim R 67 R v Harrison [2001] NSWCCA 79 R v Henry and Ors (1999) 46 NSWLR 346; [1999] NSWCCA 111 R v Qutami [2001] NSWCCA 353 R v Roberts (1994) 73 A Crim R 306 R v Street [2005] NSWCCA 139 R v Way (2004) 60 NSWLR 168; [2004] NSWCCA 131 R v Wickham [2004] NSWCCA 193 R v Wong [2003] NSWCCA 247 Ruttley v R [2010] NSWCCA 118 Wong v The Queen, Leung v The Queen (2001) 207 CLR 584; [2001] HCA 64 Category: Principal judgment Parties: F Apulu (Applicant) The King (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: D W Phillips (Applicant) S Traynor (Respondent) (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate