NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Narellan Franchise Pty Ltd v RBME Pty Ltd (No 2) [2022] NSWSC 1590 Hearing dates: 27, 31 October; 1 November 2022 Date of orders: 22 November 2022 Decision date: 22 November 2022 Jurisdiction: Equity - Expedition List Before: Parker J Decision: See [248]-[251] Catchwords: RESTRAINT OF TRADE – franchise agreement – swimming pool supply and installation business- post-contractual restraint – claimed injunction against carrying on business similar to franchised business – reasonableness – whether franchisor entitled to enforce restraint in interest of incoming franchisee – whether franchisor entitled to benefit from franchisee's accumulated skill and experience – goodwill – claimed injunction against soliciting customers with uncompleted contracts – reasonableness – hardship – injunctions refused CONTRACT – construction – franchise agreement – restraint of trade – deed poll executed by franchisee – whether enforceable by supplier of franchised goods – reasonableness Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001, s 286 Evidence Act 1995, s 79 Restraints of Trade Act 1976 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 31.19 Cases Cited: BB Australia Pty Ltd v Karioi Pty Ltd [2010] NSWCA 347 Chipsaway International Ltd v Kerr [2009] EWCA Civ 320 Cong v Sheng (No 3) [2021] NSWSC 947 Dyno-Rod Plc v Reeve [1999] FSR 148 Grimaldi v Chameleon Mining NL (No 2) (2012) 200 FCR 296 Isaac v Dargan Financial Pty Ltd (2018) 98 NSWLR 343 Label Manufacturers Australia Pty Ltd v Chatzopoulos [2022] NSWSC 1059 Lu v Lim (1993) 30 NSWLR 332 Lyne-Pirkis v Jones [1969] 1 WLR 1293 Narellan Franchise Pty Ltd v RBME Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 988 Netglory Pty Ltd v Caratti [2013] WASC 364 Stenhouse Australia Ltd v Phillips [1974] AC 391 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Narellan Franchise Pty Limited (First Plaintiff) Narellan Pools Pty Limited (Second Plaintiff) RBME Pty Limited (First Defendant) Tim Ranieri (Second Defendant) Matthew John Ranieri (Third Defendant) T&M Pools Pty Limited (Fourth Defendant) Representation: Counsel: PM Knowles SC (Plaintiffs) A Fernon SC/N Kirby (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate