NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v AT [2020] NSWDC 954 Hearing dates: Friday 21 August 2020 Date of orders: Monday 31 August 2020 Decision date: 31 August 2020 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Tupman DCJ Decision: Formal Sentence Orders: (1) The offender is convicted on all substantive offences. (2) For the offences involving TL: An aggregate sentence pursuant to s 53A of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) of 7 years with an aggregate non-parole period of 4 years and 9 (3) For offences involving KT: The offender is sentenced to a non-parole period of 5 years with parole thereafter of 4 years giving rise to an overall term of imprisonment of 9 years. (4) Overall sentence 12 years with overall non parole period 8 years. Catchwords: CRIME — Child sex offences — Maintain unlawful sexual relationship with child under – max penalty life imprisonment — Aggravated sexual assault of a child under the age of 16 — Aggravated indecent assault of a person under 16 years — Three substantive offences — Four Form 1 offences — Two victims aged between 10 and 13 years old — Offender was about 42 years old — Offender was the biological father of the victims — Offender engaged in a course of sexual-offending conduct against the two victims over relatively short period of time — Offences not one-off events — Offences occurred on a remote and decrepit rural property surrounded by bushland — Offender engaged in a wide range of sexual acts with victims and used manipulation and a degree of planning to commit offences — Offences in the middle of the range of objective seriousness — VIS provided and taken into account — Both victims have suffered serious psychological sequelae — Offender has criminal record but no sex offences — Early guilty plea — Actuarial assessment of recidivism assessed as low but real risk of re-offending is not low — Prospects of rehabilitation guarded. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW): ss 61J(1), 61M(2), 66EA; Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW): s 53A. Cases Cited: R v VJW (2000) 112 ACrimR 1. Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina (The Crown) AT (The Offender) Representation: Counsel: Ms. J. Krippner (The Crown) Ms. S. Hall (The Offender)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate