NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Constantinidis v R; Lazar v R (Costs) [2022] NSWCCA 248 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 24 November 2022 Decision date: 24 November 2022 Before: Gleeson JA; Fagan J; Lonergan J Decision: Certificates granted pursuant to ss 2 and 3 of the Costs in Criminal Cases Act Catchwords: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE – costs – application for certificate under Costs in Criminal Cases Act 1967 – successful appeal against conviction – where the Crown case critically dependent upon the credibility of Witness B – institution of proceedings unreasonable Legislation Cited: Costs in Criminal Cases Act 1967 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Cases Cited: Constantinidis v R; Lazar v R [2022] NSWCCA 4 Cox v R (No 2) [2017] NSWCCA 129 Fejsa v R (1995) 82 A Crim R 253 Higgins v R (No 2) [2022] NSWCCA 82 R v Dunne (Supreme Court (NSW), 17 May 1990, unreported) R v Johnston [2000] NSWCCA 197 R v Manley [2000] NSWCCA 196 Category: Costs Parties: Achilles Constantinidis (Applicant) Ian David Lazar (Applicant) Regina (Crown) Representation: Counsel: T Game SC with D Barrow (Applicant Constantinidis) C Parkin (Applicant Lazar) M Kumar SC (Crown)
Solicitors: Wright and Strickland Solicitors (Constantinidis) Murphy's Lawyers (Applicant Lazar) Solicitor for the Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2016/00013067 2014/00320266 Publication restriction: No
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate