NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Woodhouse v Woodhouse [2022] NSWCA 240 Hearing dates: 9 November 2022 Date of orders: 28 November 2022 Decision date: 28 November 2022 Before: Bell CJ at [1]; Meagher JA at [2]; Mitchelmore JA at [124] Decision: (1) Appeal allowed. (2) Set aside orders 1 and 2 made on 4 March 2022. (3) Judgment for Nicola Woodhouse against Philip Woodhouse on the statement of claim for $250,000 plus interest at the rate of 8% from 1 October 2014. (4) Judgment for Philip Woodhouse against Nicola Woodhouse on the cross-claim in the sum of $31,337.13 by way of equitable compensation plus interest thereon as claimed. (5) Set aside orders 1 and 2 made on 25 March 2022. (6) Order that Philip Woodhouse pay Nicola Woodhouse's costs of the statement of claim on the ordinary basis. (7) Order that Nicola Woodhouse pay 20% of Philip Woodhouse's costs of the cross-claim against her on the ordinary basis. (8) Order that Philip Woodhouse pay Nicola Woodhouse's costs of the appeal on the ordinary basis. Catchwords: CONTRACT – where alleged oral agreement for loan of $267,000 by mother to adult son – where mother pleaded loan repayable after five years – where mother drew cheques on son's bank account in favour of herself in purported payment of interest on loan and part repayment of principal – whether primary judge erred in not being persuaded any agreement existed – whether primary judge erred in finding that any loan if made out was repayable on demand so that limitation period commenced to run when moneys advanced and action statute-barred Legislation Cited: Limitation Act 1969 (NSW), ss 14(1), 54(2)(a)(ii) Cases Cited: Byrnes v Kendle (2011) 243 CLR 353; [2011] HCA 26 Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118; [2003] HCA 22 Haller v Ayre [2005] 2 Qd R 410; [2005] QCA 224 Ogilvie v Adams [1981] VR 1041 Re Brookers (Aust) Ltd (in liq); Brooker v Pridham (1986) 41 SASR 380 Toll (FGCT) Pty Ltd v Alphapharm Pty Ltd (2004) 219 CLR 165; [2004] HCA 52 VL Finance Pty Ltd v Legudi [2003] VSC 57 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Nicola Mary Woodhouse (Appellant) Philip George Woodhouse (First Respondent) David Andrew Woodhouse (Second Respondent) Lincoln James Kennedy (Third Respondent) Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate