NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Tafra; R v Westaway [2021] NSWDC 833 Hearing dates: Thursday 25 November 2021 Date of orders: Thursday 2 - Friday 3 December 2021 Decision date: 03 December 2021 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Tupman DCJ Decision: Ongoing Drug Supply Matter (1) The offender, Lawrence Tafra, is convicted. (2) Sentenced to a non-parole period of 18 months with parole thereafter of 9 months giving rise to an overall term of 2 years and 3 months Detain for Advantage Matter Tafra: RE: Sequence 14, 15, 19 (1) For the three substantive offences, the offender is convicted (2) He is sentenced pursuant to s 53A of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 to an aggregate sentence comprising a non- parole period of 2 years with parole thereafter of 18 months giving rise to an overall term of 3 years and 6 months RE: Sequences 17 and 22 (3) Form 1 offences taken into account. RE: Sequences 3 and 7 (4) Backup offences: withdrawn and dismissed. RE: Sequences 1 & 6 (5) Convicted. (6) Pursuant to s 10A, no further order is necessary. (7) In each case, he is disqualified for the minimum period of 6 months. RE: Sequence 4 (8) Convicted. (9) Pursuant to s 10A, no further order is necessary. (10) The offender is disqualified for a period of 18 months. Westaway: (1) The offender is convicted. (2) For each offence he is sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 18 months to be served by way of an ICO. Catchwords: CRIME — Drug offences — Ongoing supply — methylamphetamine — Detain for advantage — Circumstances of aggravation — Detain for advantage offences arose because offenders thought person had stolen drugs from them — Each offender involved in a drug supply network —Charges range from below the mid-range of objective seriousness to the middle of the range — Offenders 33 and 47 at the time of offending — Both offenders have criminal records — One offender committed offences whilst regularly using drugs — Both offenders have mental health issues — Both offenders have history of drug use from young age — Both offenders express remorse and contrition — No victim impact statements provided — Excessive charges and delays caused by EAGP scheme negotiations discussed. Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW): ss 10A, 53A. Crimes Act 1900 (NSW): ss 33B(1)(a), 86(2)(a), 193B(2). Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW): s 166. Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW): s 25(1); S25A. Category: Sentence Parties: Regina (The Crown) Laurence Tafra (Offender) Anthony Westaway (Offender) Representation: Solicitors: Ms. C. Black; Ms. T. Jay (The Crown) Mr. S. Bouveng (Offender, Tafra) Mr. F. Falcomata (Offender, Westaway) File Number(s): 2020/00260460 (Tafra) 2020/00356072 (Tafra) 2020/00262669 (Westaway)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate