NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Freeman v South Western Sydney Local Health District [2022] NSWSC 1642 Hearing dates: 23 March 2022 Date of orders: 02 December 2022 Decision date: 02 December 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Rothman J Decision: (1) Judgment for the first defendant; (2) Proceedings dismissed; (3) The plaintiff shall pay the first defendant's costs of and incidental to the proceedings. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review of administrative tribunal deciding appeal against termination of a VMO Contract, being independent contract – alleged denial of procedural fairness – issues opened up – reasonable opportunity to prepare and present case – issues raising in termination letter – also raised in affidavits – no objection or adjournment sought when put in cross-examination – alleged misunderstanding of nature of appeal – no error disclosed – no irrelevant considerations and all mandatory considerations utilised – while some may consider decision unfair in light of capacity of VMO to act in accordance with own judgment, determination of breakdown in confidence not "legally unreasonable" Legislation Cited: Health Services Act 1997 (NSW), ss 77,78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 89, 96, 105, 106, 107, 108, 110, 111, 112 Public Hospitals Act 1929 (NSW) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 69 Cases Cited: Annetts v McCann (1990) 170 CLR 596; [1990] HCA 57 Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223 Attorney-General (NSW) v Quin (1990) 170 CLR 1; [1990] HCA 21 Burge v NSW BHP Steel Pty Ltd (2001) 105 IR 325; [2001] NSWIRComm 117 Coal and Allied Operations Pty Ltd v Australian industrial Relations Commission (2000) 203 CLR 194; [2000] HCA 47 Collector of Customs v Pozzolanic (1993) 43 FCR 280; [1993] FCA 456 Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Personnel Contracting Pty Ltd (2002) 96 ALJR 89; [2022] HCA 1 Freeman v Sydney Local Health District [2021] NSWSC 423 Lacey v Attorney-General (Qld) (2011) 242 CLR 573; [2011] HCA 10 Macksville & District Hospital v Mayze (1987) 10 NSWLR 708 Malek Fahd Islamic School Limited v Minister for Education and Early Childhood Learning [2022] NSWSC 1176 Minister For Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24; [1986] HCA 40 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li (2013) 249 CLR 332; [2013] HCA 18 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1986) 185 CLR 259; [1996] HCA 6 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu (1999) 197 CLR 611; [1999] HCA 21 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355; [1998] HCA 28 Re Building Workers' Industrial Union; Ex parte Gallagher (1988) 62 ALJR 81 at 84; [1988] HCA 4 Sullivan v Department of Transport (1978) 20 ALR 323; [1978] FCA 323 Victorian Stevedoring and General Contracting Co Pty Ltd and Meakes v Dignan (1931) 46 CLR 73; [1931] HCA 34 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Anthony Freeman (Plaintiff) South Western Sydney Local Health District (First Defendant) The New South Wales Health Committee of Review (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: J Glissan QC / D Nagle / G Diggins (Plaintiff) H Younan SC / A Britt (First Defendant) Submitting Appearance (Second Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate