NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Patel v Shukla [2022] NSWSC 1644 Hearing dates: 31 May 2022 Date of orders: 02 December 2022 Decision date: 02 December 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Rothman J Decision: (1) The Court refuses leave to appeal; (2) The Court dismisses the proceedings; (3) The plaintiff shall pay the defendant's costs of and incidental to these proceedings. Catchwords: APPEALS – from Local Court to Supreme Court on question of law – or with leave on interlocutory judgment and mixed fact and law – extension of time necessary – two years after interlocutory judgment in one case and six-and-a-half months in the other – question of fact, not fact and law – delay not adequately explained – no error – leave refused. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 9, 56, 98 Local Court Act 2007 (NSW), ss 39, 40 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 42.21 Cases Cited: Douglas v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd [1983] 3 NSWLR 126 Hutchinson v Nominal Defendant [1972] 1 NSWLR 443 Parisienne Basket Shoes Pty Ltd v Whyte (1938) 59 CLR 369; [1938] HCA 7 Re Jarman; ex parte Cook [No 1] (1997) 188 CLR 595; [1997] HCA 13 Wilkshire and Coffey v Commonwealth of Australia (1976) 9 ALR 325 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Bhaveshkumar Bhanubhal Patel (Plaintiff) Alkesh Shukla (First Defendant) Dilipkumar Chhaganbhai Chauhan (Second Defendant) Representation: Advocate: Self-represented (Plaintiff) V Mishra (First and Second Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate