NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Health Care Complaints Commission v Ang (No 2) [2022] NSWCATOD 160 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 5 December 2022 Decision date: 05 December 2022 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: R C Titterton OAM, Senior Member Decision: 1. A hearing is dispensed with. 2. The respondent is to pay 90% of the applicant's costs as agreed or as assessed. Catchwords: PROFESSIONS AND TRADES – health care professional – pharmacy – costs – differential costs order Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) – s 50 Cases Cited: Doppstadt Australia Pty Ltd v Lovick & Son Developments Pty Ltd (No 2) [2014] NSWCA 219 Harrington Estates (NSW) Pty Ltd t/as Harrington Grove Country Club v Turner [2016] NSWCA 369 Health Care Complaints Commission v Emery (No. 2) [2017] NSWCATOD 23 Health Care Complaints Commission v Gahan (No 2) [2021] NSWCATOD 66 Health Care Complaints Commission v Philipiah [2013] NSWCA 342 Lucire v Health Care Complaints Commission (No 2) [2011] NSWCA 182 Monie v Commonwealth of Australia (No.2) [2008] NSWCA 15 Qasim v Health Care Complaints Commission [2015] NSWCA 282 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Costs Parties: Applicant: Health Care Complaints Commission Respondent: Judd Seng Long Ang Representation: Counsel: T Saunders (Respondent)
Solicitors: Health Care Complaints Commission (Applicant) Meridian Lawyers ( Respondent) File Number(s): 2022/00007684 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate