NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Cross v R [2022] NSWCCA 261 Hearing dates: 11 October 2022 Date of orders: 09 December 2022 Decision date: 09 December 2022 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1]; Button J at [58]; Wilson J at [59] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal. (2) Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: CRIME — appeals — appeal against sentence on parity ground — offence of in company detaining a person with intent to obtain financial advantage and actual bodily harm occasioned contrary to s 86(3) of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) — whether applicant has a justifiable sense of grievance when sentence is compared to that of co-offender Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 86 Cases Cited: Afu v R [2017] NSWCCA 246 Baquiran v R [2014] NSWCCA 221 Borg v R [2019] NSWCCA 129 Green v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 462; [2011] HCA 49 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Lloyd v R [2017] NSWCCA 303 R v MAK [2006] NSWCCA 381; (2006) 167 A Crim R 159 Smith (a pseudonym) v R [2022] NSWCCA 123 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Leticia Maree Cross (Applicant) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: C O'Neill (Applicant) C O Gleeson (Respondent)
Solicitors: Legal Aid NSW (Applicant) Director of Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2020/311030 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 29 November 2021 Before: Tupman DCJ File Number(s): 2020/311030
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate