NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Rai v Farah [2022] NSWCATCD 153 Hearing dates: 27 July 2022 Date of orders: 17 August 2022 Decision date: 17 August 2022 Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Before: H Woods, Senior Member Decision: 1. Mouda Laser Skin Clinic Pty Ltd is to pay Dhan Pat Rai $7830.00 within 28 days; 2. The application is otherwise dismissed. 3. If either party wishes to make an application for costs, they are to file submissions in support of that application including the costs order sought and whether the question of costs can be determined on the papers without the need for a further hearing and within 14 days. 4. Any submissions in reply, are to be filed and served within a further 14 days thereafter. Catchwords: LEASES AND TENANCIES — Retail leases — Retail shop lease LEASES AND TENANCIES — Default and termination — Damages Legislation Cited: Retail Leases Act 1994 (NSW) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Dhan Pat Rai (Applicant) Roxanne Farah and Joseph Farah (First Respondent) Mouda Laser Skin Clinic Pty Ltd (Second Respondent) FoxArt 1 Family Trust Pty Ltd (Third Respondent) Representation: Applicant (Self represented) First Respondent (Self represented) J Farah, First Respondent (Second Respondent) J Farah, First Respondent (Third Respondent) File Number(s): COM 22/22562 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate