NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Teece v R [2022] NSWCCA 265 Hearing dates: 24 October 2022 Decision date: 15 December 2022 Before: Garling J at [1]; Button J at [2]; Wilson J at [74] Decision: 1) Leave to appeal, including out of time, granted. 2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME – Appeals – Appeal against sentence – Manifest excess – Parity – Misapplication of principle – Error in fact finding – Where two judges sentenced co-offenders separately – Where appellate court does not go behind fact finding – Evaluative assessment of each sentencing judge as to objective findings and weight given to subjective features – Appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW Firearms Act 1996 (NSW) Cases Cited: Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194 House v the King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Lowe v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 606; [1984] HCA 46 Patel v R [2022] NSWCCA 93 PG v R [2017] NSWCCA 179 R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346; [1999] NSWCCA 111 Rae v R [2011] NSWCCA 211 Tran v R (Cth) [2020] NSWCCA 310 WM v R [2020] NSWCCA 96 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Matthew Teece (Applicant) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: D Phillips (Applicant) A Bonnor (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate