NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Joseph v Kiama Municipal Council [2022] NSWCATAD 392 Hearing dates: 11 November 2022 Date of orders: 9 December 2022 Decision date: 09 December 2022 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: M Griffin, Senior Member Decision: The Tribunal refuses the application for summary dismissal. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW- summary dismissal-freedom of information- government information public access- whether application is frivolous, vexatious, misconceived or lacking in substance-Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (NSW) Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act (NSW) 1997 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 Cases Cited: Choi v University of Technology Sydney [2019] NSWCATAD 176 Zonnevylle v Secretary, Department of Education [2021] NSWCATAD 361 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) [1964] HCA 69; (1964) 112 CLR 125 Prakash v Bobb Borg Enterprises Pty Ltd [1999] NSWADT 73 Department of Communities and Justice v Tebb [2020] NSWCATAP 179 Miriani v Transport for NSW [2021] NSWCATAD 16 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: Michael Joseph (Applicant) Kiama Municipal Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel R Coffey (Respondent)
Applicant (Self-represented) Bradley Allen Love Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2022/00236000, 2022/00235607, 2022/00251353 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate