NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Mirow v Mirow [2022] NSWCATAP 383 Hearing dates: 23 November 2022 Date of orders: 9 December 2022 Decision date: 09 December 2022 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: G Ellis SC, Senior Member A Boxall, Senior Member Decision: 1. The application to extend time to appeal is dismissed. 2. Each party is to bear their own costs. Catchwords: APPEALS – No question of principle Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), s 41, s 60, s 80 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 (NSW), cl 25, cl 35, cl 38A Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW), s 87 Cases Cited: Cominos v Di Rico [2016] NSWCATAP 5 Jackson v NSW Land and Housing Corporation [2014] NSWCATAP 22 Megerditchian v Kumond Homes Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 120 Prendergast v Western Murray Irrigation Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 69 Ryan v BKB Motor Vehicle Repairs Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCATAP 39 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: Alexander Mirow (Appellant) Brett Andrew Mirow (Respondent) Representation: Appellant (Self-represented) Respondent (No-appearance) File Number(s): 2022/00277672 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Citation: [2022] NSWCATCD Before: P Gardner and P Zammit, General Members File Number(s): RT 22/14694
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate