NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: James v Jandson Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 1686 Hearing dates: 2 June 2022 Date of orders: 12 December 2022 Decision date: 12 December 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: N Adams J Decision: (1) The summons is dismissed. (2) The plaintiffs are to pay the defendant's costs. Catchwords: BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION – NCAT – Appeal of NCAT Appeal Panel decision – application to extend time for this appeal refused – summons dismissed – statutory warranties as to residential building work – breach of statutory warranty – whether new contract entered into or original contract varied – offer and acceptance – consideration – forbearance to sue – completion date of building works – leave to appeal finding of facts – interpretation of s 3B Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) – ss 80, 83, 84(2), sch 4 cl 12 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) – s 3B, 18B, 18BA, 18E, 48K, sch 4 cl 109 Home Building Amendment Act 2011 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) – r 50.3 Cases Cited: Abalos v Australian Postal Commission [1990] HCA 47; (1990) 171 CLR 167 Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 at 326; [1990] HCA 33 Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Devries v Australian National Railways Commission [1993] HCA 78; (1993) 177 CLR 472 Haider v JP Morgan Holdings Aust Ltd t/as JP Morgan Operations Australia Ltd [2007] NSWCA 158 Hendriks v McGeoch [2008] NSWCA 53; (2008) Aust Torts Reports 81-942 House v The King, (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Integrated Computer Services Pty Ltd v Digital Equipment Corp (Aust) Pty Ltd (1988) 5 BPR 11,110 Jandson Pty Ltd v James [2021] NSWCATAP 274 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Kriketos v Livschitz [2009] NSWCA 96 Lim v Cho [2018] NSWCA 145; (2018) 84 MVR 514 McDonnell v The Owners – Strata Plan No 64191 [2022] NSWSC 1631 Norbis v Norbis (1986) 161 CLR 513; [1986] HCA 17 Ormwave v Smith [2007] NSWCA 210 R v Clarke [1927] HCA 47; (1927) 40 CLR 227 Rosenberg v Percival [2001] HCA 18; (2001) 205 CLR 434 Sand Ground Engineering Pty Ltd v Super Render Pty Ltd [2020] NSWSC 458 Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services v Smith (2017) 95 NSWLR 597; [2017] NSWCA 206 State Rail Authority of New South Wales v Earthline Constructions Pty Ltd (in liq) [1999] HCA 3; (1999) 160 ALR 588 Suncorp Metway Insurance v Owners Corporation SP 64487 [2009] NSWCA 223 The Australian Gas Light Company v Valuer-General (1940) 40 SR (NSW) 126 Toll (FGCT) Pty Ltd v Alphapharm Pty Ltd (2004) 219 CLR 165 Toplace Pty Ltd v The Council of the City of Sydney [2020] NSWLEC 121 Warren v Coombes (1979) 142 CLR 531; [1979] HCA 9 Weiss v The Queen [2005] 224 CLR 300; HCA 81 Texts Cited: G E Dal Pont, Law of Agency (3rd ed, 2014, Lexis Nexis Butterworths) at [1.39] Category: Principal judgment Parties: Brett James (First Plaintiff) Liza James (Second Plaintiff) Jandson Pty Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr PJ Bambagiotti (Plaintiffs) Mr M Klooster (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate