NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Frantzis v Kumar Motors (Bankstown) Pty Ltd t/a Peninsular Motor Group [2022] NSWCATCD 163 Hearing dates: 25 March 2022, 3 June 2022 Date of orders: 26 August 2022 Decision date: 26 August 2022 Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Before: P French, Senior Member Decision: (1) The application is dismissed. Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW – consumer guarantees – supply of goods – guarantee as to acceptable quality CONSUMER LAW – consumer guarantees – supply of services – guarantee as to fitness for a particular purpose CONSUMER LAW – general protections – misleading and deceptive conduct Legislation Cited: Australian Consumer Law (NSW) – ss 3, 18, 54, 61, 63, 259 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 (NSW) – r 35 Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) – ss 28, 74, 79N Cases Cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Dukemaster Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 682 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Arthur Frantzis (Applicant) Kumar Motors (Bankstown) Pty Ltd t/a Peninsular Motor Group (First respondent) Integrity Car Care Pty Ltd (Second respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Tiliakos (Applicant)
Solicitors: Koutzoumis Lawyers (Applicant)
Other: U Singh (First Respondent) M Sherry (Second Respondent) File Number(s): MV 21/50677 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate