NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Enoka v R [2022] NSWCCA 272 Hearing dates: 04 November 2022 Date of orders: 15 December 2022 Decision date: 15 December 2022 Before: Garling J at [1] Adamson J at [145] Button J at [146] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal; (2) Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: CRIME — Appeals — Appeal against conviction — Inconsistent verdicts — Applicant charged with one count of intentionally choking, one count of aggravated sexual assault and nine counts of sexual intercourse without consent — Jury found the applicant guilty of intentionally choking but not guilty of each other count — Where the events founding the 11 counts were intertwined temporally and contextually — Whether there was any logical basis to distinguish the verdicts — Distinguishing factors included the different elements of the offences, the different availability and quality of objective evidence and the different quality of complaint evidence — Appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 ss 37(1), 61I, 61J(1) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 s 5(1)(b) Cases Cited: Dadley v R [2021] NSWCCA 267 Liberato v The Queen (1985) 159 CLR 507; [1985] HCA 66 MFA v The Queen (2002) 213 CLR 606; [2002] HCA 53 Roos v R [2019] NSWCCA 67 Texts Cited: Not applicable Category: Principal judgment Parties: Tuii Enoka (Applicant) The Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: L Brasch / J Leaver (Applicant) S Traynor (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate