NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Suliasi Taumalolo; R v Mateaki Taumalolo; R v Mayol; R v ST; R v ET [2022] NSWSC 1696 Hearing dates: 21 October & 18 November 2022 Date of orders: 14 December 2022 Decision date: 14 December 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Davies J Decision: Suliasi Taumalolo is convicted of the offence of affray. Sentenced to imprisonment with a non-parole period of 2 years and 3 months commencing 14 July 2020 and expiring 13 October 2022 with a balance of term of 1 year and 6 months expiring 12 April 2024. ET is convicted of the offence of affray. Sentenced to imprisonment with a non-parole of 2 years commencing 20 March 2020 expiring on 19 March 2022 with a balance of term of 1 year and 4 months expiring 19 July 2023. Order that ET serve the sentence as a juvenile offender. ST is convicted of the offence of manslaughter. Sentenced to imprisonment with a non-parole period of 4 years and 1 month commencing 26 August 2019 and expiring 25 September 2023 with a balance of term of 2 years and 8 months expiring 25 May 2026. Order that ST serve the sentence as a juvenile offender. Mateaki Taumalolo is convicted of the offence of affray. Sentenced to imprisonment with a non-parole period of 2 years and 4 months commencing 15 September 2020 and expiring 14 January 2023 with a balance of term of 1 year and 5 months expiring 14 June 2024. Sione Mayol is convicted of the offence of affray. Sentenced to imprisonment with a non-parole period of 1 year 1 month and 25 days commencing 18 May 2021 and expiring 12 July 2022 with a balance of term of 1 year 7 months and 5 days expiring 16 February 2024. Catchwords: CRIME – sentence – five co-offenders – another co-offender sentenced previously for murder – pleas of affray and manslaughter – offenders attendees at a 16th birthday party – three offenders observed punching kicking and stomping on deceased – two offenders otherwise involved in the affray - youthful offenders – offence concerned frequently engaged in by young men fuelled up on drugs of alcohol or both – apparently random attack – deceased died at the scene – where conduct of various participants will not always call for differentiation in penalty – moral culpability – conduct of group significant – significance of effect of attack on persons on the scene –wider focus than direct victim – discounts for plea of guilty CRIME – sentence – plea of guilty to manslaughter – where contribution to joint criminal enterprise kicking and stomping on deceased a number of times whilst deceased lying on the ground – offence serious – where court satisfied that special circumstances justify offender serving remainder of his sentence as juvenile offender – risks of placing young men in adult correctional facilities Legislation Cited: Bail Act 2013 (NSW) S 22b Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 (NSW) SS 3, 6, 16, 18, 19 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) ss 21A, 30E Cases Cited: Buckley v R [2022] VSCA 138 KT v The Queen [2008] NSWCCA 51; (2008) A Crim R 112 Khanwaiz v R [2012] NSWCCA 168 R v Ali [2005] NSWSC 334 R v Eleter [2003] NSWCCA 130 R v Huynh; R v Lam; R v Ta [2000] NSWCCA 18 Stevens v R [2007] NSWCCA 152 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Crown Suliasi Levula Taumalolo (Offender) Mateaki Taumalolo (Offender) Sione Taulepa Mayol (Offender) ST (Offender) ET (Offender) Representation: Counsel: V Garrity & K Marinos (Crown) N Carroll (Suliasi Levula Taumalolo) P English (Mateaki Taumalolo) C Davenport SC (Sione Taulepa Mayol) R Wilson SC (ST) P Johnson (ET)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate