NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Majak v Rose & Ors [2022] NSWSC 1697 Hearing dates: 26, 27, 28 April 2022 Written submissions (first and second defendants) 13 May 2022 Written submissions (third defendant) 27 May 2022 Written submissions (plaintiff) 28 June 2022 Date of orders: 16 December 2022 Decision date: 16 December 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Bellew J Decision: (1) The proceedings are dismissed. (2) The plaintiff is to pay the costs of each of the first, second and third defendants, as agreed or assessed. (3) I direct the solicitor for the first defendant to provide a copy of this judgment to the plaintiff's Trustee in Bankruptcy within 7 days. Catchwords: TORTS – Causes of action pleaded in conspiracy, fraud and collateral abuse of process – Where the plaintiff and the first defendant were previously in a relationship – Where the first defendant brought proceedings in the Local Court for an Apprehended Domestic Violence Order against the plaintiff – Where the protected persons were identified as the first defendant and the second defendant – Where the third defendant was a solicitor who acted for the first defendant in those proceedings – Where plaintiff failed to establish that the proceedings had been brought by the first defendant for an improper purpose or that they had been impermissibly used in some way – Proceedings dismissed Legislation Cited: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW) Cases Cited: Blair v Curran (1939) 62 CLR 464; [1939] HCA 23 Burton v Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (2019) 100 NSWLR 734; [2019] NSWCA 245 Majak v Rose [2019] Fam CA 1013 Maxwell-Smith v S and E Hall Pty Ltd and anor. (2014) 86 NSWLR 481; [2014] NSWCA 146 Williams v Spautz (1992) 174 CLR 509; [1992] HCA 34 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Zofia Bozena Majak – Plaintiff Alan Wesley Rose – First Defendant Shelia Jasmin Rebeiro – Second Defendant Marc Riviere – Third Defendant Representation: Counsel: Self-represented – Plaintiff J Loofs SC and M Klooster – First and Second Defendants I Griscti – Third Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate