NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Blakeney v R [2022] NSWCCA 277 Hearing dates: 2 December 2022 Date of orders: 16 December 2022 Decision date: 16 December 2022 Before: Bell CJ at [1] Ward P at [2] Wilson J at [3] Decision: 1. Refuse leave to advance grounds 1, 3 and 4. 2. Otherwise grant leave to appeal. 3. Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: CRIME – SENTENCE – appeal against sentence – supply large commercial quantity of a prohibited drug – question of whether proper allowance made for future prospects or rehabilitation – question of whether a finding of remorse should have been made – question of whether greater allowance should have been made for "quasi-custody" Legislation Cited: Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Cases Cited: Apulu v R [2022] NSWCCA 244 DPP (Cth) v De La Rosa (2010) 79 NSWLR 1; [2010] NSWCCA 194 Gould v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) (2018) 273 A Crim R 91; [2018] NSWCCA 109 Imbornone v R [2017] NSWCCA 144 La v R [2021] NSWCCA 136 Parente v R (2017) 96 NSWLR 633; [2017] NSWCCA 284 R v Quinlan (2021) 293 A Crim R 253; [2021] NSWCCA 284 R v Qutami (2001) 127 A Crim R 369; [2001] NSWCCA 353 Robertson v R [2017] NSWCCA 205 Wong v R [2018] NSWCCA 263 Category: Principal judgment Parties: J K Blakeney (Applicant) The King (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Chhabra and Ms H Blake (Applicant) C Young (Crown) (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate