NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Aksan v Godfrey (No 2) [2022] NSWCATAP 389 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 15 December 2022 Decision date: 15 December 2022 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: G Blake AM SC, Senior Member G Curtin SC, Senior Member Decision: (1) A hearing of the respondent's costs application is dispensed with. (2) The appellants are to pay the respondent's costs in the sum of $6,836.50 plus GST immediately. Catchwords: COSTS — no question of principle Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), ss 50, 60 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 (NSW), rr 38, 38A Cases Cited: Allen v TriCare (Hastings) Ltd [2017] NSWCATAP 25 Baulderstone Hornibrook Engineering Pty Ltd v Gordian Runoff Ltd (No. 2) [2009] NSWCA 12 The Owners – Strata Plan No 63731 v B & G Trading Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] NSWCATAP 273 Thompson v Chapman [2016] NSWCATAP 6 Texts Cited: NCAT Guideline – Internal Appeals Category: Costs Parties: Jacek Aksan (First Appellant) Andrea Aksan (Second Appellant) Desmond Godfrey (Respondent) Representation: First Appellant (No Appearance) Second Appellant (No Appearance) Mills Oakley (Respondent) File Number(s): 2022/00237238 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Citation: N/A Date of Decision: 26 July 2022 Before: G Ellis SC, Senior Member File Number(s): HB 21/30992; HB 21/33423
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate