NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Luo v City of Parramatta Council (No 2) [2023] NSWLEC 1010 Hearing dates: 13-14 June 2022; 26 October 2022 Date of orders: 24 January 2023 Decision date: 24 January 2023 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dixon SC Decision: The Court orders: (1) The appeal is upheld. (2) Development consent is granted to DA/255/2021 for the demolition of the existing structures and the construction of a four-storey boarding house comprising 25 rooms, one manger's room and basement parking on land at 35 Simpson Street, Dundas Valley, subject to the conditions of consent in Annexure A. (3) The exhibits are returned except for A. Catchwords: APPEAL – development application – boarding house development – revised plan of management and conditions of consent – final orders made Cases Cited: Luo v City of Parramatta Council [2023] NSWLEC 1009 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Fei Luo (Applicant) City of Parramatta Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: G McKee (Solicitor) (Applicant) D Le Breton (Solicitor) (Respondent)
Solicitors: McKees Legal Solutions (Applicant) HWL Ebsworth Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2021/360939 Publication restriction: Nil
Judgment 1. On 11 January 2023, I handed down my reasons for judgment in the Class 1 appeal, Luo v City of Parramatta Council [2023] NSWLEC 1009. At [49] of Luo v City of Parramatta Council, I directed the parties to confer and amend the plan of management and their draft conditions of consent in accordance with my reasons for judgment and to provide a copy to the Court. 2. As I am satisfied having reviewed the agreed conditions provided on 20 January 2023 that they are acceptable, I now make the following orders. 3. The Court orders that: 1. The appeal is upheld. 2. Development consent is granted to DA/255/2021 for the demolition of the existing structures and the construction of a four-storey boarding house comprising 25 rooms, one manger's room and basement parking on land at 35 Simpson Street, Dundas Valley, subject to the conditions of consent in Annexure A. 3. The exhibits are returned except for A. ……………………….. S Dixon Senior Commissioner of the Court Annexure A (369779, pdf)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate