NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Z v R [2022] NSWCCA 286 Hearing dates: 11 July 2022 Date of orders: 16 December 2022 Decision date: 16 December 2022 Before: Bell CJ at [1]; Mitchelmore JA at [2]; Yehia J at [76]. Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal. (2) Appeal allowed. (3) Quash the sentence imposed in the District Court on 2 December 2020. (4) In lieu thereof, sentence the applicant to a term of imprisonment comprising a non-parole period of 3 years, backdated to commence from 2 December 2020, with a balance of term of 3 years. (5) The effect is that the earliest date on which the applicant will be eligible for release to parole is 1 December 2023, with the balance of term to expire on 1 December 2026. Catchwords: CRIME – appeals – appeal against sentence – parity – criminal drug syndicate – manufacture large commercial quantity of prohibited drug, 3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine, contrary to Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act (NSW), s 24(2) – participate in criminal ground contrary to Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 93T(1) – where cystic fibrosis "fundamental to subjective case" – whether justifiable sense of grievance in light of the sentence imposed on co-offenders Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 93T(1) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) ss 3A, 5(1), 54A, 54D Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), ss 24(2), 33(3)(a) Cases Cited: Awraham v R (Cth) [2021] NSWCCA 241 C v R [2022] NSWCCA 285 DS v R [2014] NSWCCA 267 Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 462; [2011] HCA 49 Huckstadt v R [2016] NSWCCA 22 Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 Lewis v R [2021] NSWCCA 108 Lloyd v R [2017] NSWCCA 303 Lowe v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 606; [1984] HCA 46 Miles v R [2017] NSWCCA 266 Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295 R v Edwards (1996) 90 A Crim R 510 Rodriego (a Pseudonym) v R [2021] NSWCCA 237 SF v R [2022] NSWCCA 216 Young (pseudonym) v R [2021] NSWCCA 163 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Z (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr A Chhabra and Ms C Brain (Applicant) Ms M Kumar and Mr M Clark (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate